Akademik Veri Yönetim Sistemi
VESTNIK VOLGOGRADSKOGO GOSUDARSTVENNOGO UNIVERSITETA. SERIIA 4. ISTORIIA. REGIONOVEDENIE. MEZHDUNARODNYE OTNOSHENIIA, cilt.28, sa.2, ss.159-171, 2023 (ESCI)
Introduction. Terminological work, both in the world and in Russian science, was carried out, first
of all, on the material of exact and technical disciplines. Arrangement of terminology of humanitarian knowledge has
been in the focus of attention of researchers only in recent years. Thus, the aim of the work is to study the
terminological system of historical knowledge by means of parametric analysis of the little-known course by
V.O. Klyuchevsky “Terminology of Russian History”, which was first published in 1956 and practically was not
studied by either historians or linguists, and this substantiates the novelty of the present work. Materials and
Methods. The material of this course, studied with the help of historical-comparative, historical-typological, as well
as general scientific methods such as analysis and synthesis, using parametric analysis and positional statistics,
showed that the terminology proposed by V.O. Kluchevsky has a systemic nature and its structure is hierarchical.
Nine parameters – archaeological, geographical, terminological, illustrative, source study, classification,
chronological, economic, etymological – were singled out in the work. A conditional notion of the place of each
parameter in the so-called “dictionary article”, which is determined by the boundary of the two parameters, was
introduced. The notion of a “dictionary article” as applied to the course materials is conditional, since the course
is not a dictionary proper. Analysis. Using statistical methods, the frequency of occurrence of each parameter in a
certain place in each of the three parts of the course is identified. Statistical tables are formed, which make it
possible to see the similarity and difference between the three parts of the course and to point out their features.
This article traces not only the scientist’s fluency in ancient and modern languages, including rare ones, but also
the ability to use linguistic techniques, such as historical-etymological and word-formation analysis, on the material
of the “Terminology of Russian History.” Results. The semantic invariant in the construction of the parts of the
course has been revealed. This is an additional evidence of the systematic nature of the historical terminology,
which was suggested by V.O. Klyuchevsky. The hierarchical nature of the system of terms, created in the course by
V.O. Klyuchevsky, has been determined. Contribution of the authors. Mustafa Ozturk developed the concept of
the article, wrote the “Introduction” and “Results” sections. Y.G. Kokorina conducted parametric and statistical
analysis, wrote the “Analysis” section, participated together with M.M. Vagabov in writing the “Materials and
Methods” section, carried out the scientific editing of the entire text of the work. M.M. Vagabov wrote the
“Discussion” section and, together with Y.G. Kokorina, the “Materials and Methods” section.