Modelling of Pyrolysis Product Yields by Artificial Neural Networks


MERDUN H., SEZGİN İ. V.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RENEWABLE ENERGY RESEARCH, cilt.8, sa.2, ss.1178-1188, 2018 (ESCI) identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 8 Sayı: 2
  • Basım Tarihi: 2018
  • Dergi Adı: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RENEWABLE ENERGY RESEARCH
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI), Scopus
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.1178-1188
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Biomass, pyrolysis, modelling, feed-forward network, cascade-forward network, FIXED-BED PYROLYSIS, BIO-OIL PRODUCTION, CATALYTIC PYROLYSIS, SLOW PYROLYSIS, REACTOR CHARACTERIZATION, KINETIC-PARAMETERS, PISTACHIO SHELL, COTTONSEED CAKE, SAFFLOWER SEED, HEATING RATE
  • Akdeniz Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Artificial neural network (ANN) needs to be applied to the complex, multivariate, and highly variable biomass and pyrolysis data to define optimum input variables and develop effective models. In this study, two different ANN methods, the feed-forward network (FFN) and the cascade-forward network (CFN), were applied to model pyrolysis product yields (biochar-BC, bio-oil-BO, and gas mixture-G) from 11 biomass and pyrolysis variables through hierarchical modeling approach. Both methods were supplied with two subsets of data, with two-thirds being used for training and one-third for testing the performances of the methods, after normalizing all data (72 samples). The performances of both ANN methods were evaluated by using three statistical parameters. In general, FFN and CFN methods had very similar performances in training and testing Both methods had mean R-2 of 0.91, 0.96, and 0.95 for training BC, BO, and G, respectively. For testing of all FFN and CFN models, the R-2 values of BC and G were less than 0.50, but the R-2 values of BO were over 0.50 (up to 0.81) for only the last 5 models of FFN and CFN. Both types of ANNs are promising tools in predicting pyrolysis product yields.